You forgot to add it to your profile The picture looks flat despite the "beautiful" bokeh. The right side of the frame is deliberately puffy and glaring. The "author's" color message isn't quite clear. But basically, you could start a story about "this is how I see it" and "I don't care what you think."
You forgot to add it to your profile. The picture looks flat despite the "beautiful" bokeh. The right side of the frame is deliberately puffy and swollen. The "author's" color message isn't quite clear. But you could start a story about "that's how I see it" and "I don't care what you think."
YK., you could start a story about how someone is just a worthless connoisseur))) I don't even want to hear it...you clearly shouldn't be studying photography at university) Goodbye
You forgot to add it to your profile. The picture looks flat despite the "beautiful" bokeh. The right side of the frame is deliberately puffy and glaring. The "author's" color message isn't quite clear. But you could start a story about "this is how I see it" and "I don't care what you think."
))) Well, I see no one's reading the photo?!?... Blur can only be in the minds of clumsy photographers)))
Mikalai Maminau (Nikolodion), I read up on it...) They should have just slapped exif and caption onto the right-hand blur on the PP... Hieroglyphs... And there wouldn't have been any questions, and the overall tonality would have been corrected at the same time.... Are you here for long? I can, with my unfinished secondary special education, say something else...)
Wow, this photo is from 2013... the author is like... Uh...uh...uh...
Troitsky Andrey, yeah, this latest pick-up artist from the dumpsters is so slow – he's only responding to comments after 12 years. And no matter how many times he sends uneducated commenters packing, the misunderstanding here won't go away - View crop
))) Well, I see no one's reading the footage?!?...Blur can only be in the minds of clumsy photographers)))
Mikalai Maminau (Nikolodion), That's right! For example, I like the left side of the frame and the model herself better. Maybe because you can read the captions there. And no blur in your head! Otherwise, they'll come up with all these foreign words, and how do you use them?...
Troitsky Andrey, yeah, this is another trash-dump picker who's so slow – he's only responding to comments after 12 years. And no matter how many times he sends uneducated commentators packing, the misunderstanding here won't go away - View crop
M Y X O M O P, I don't want to look for the original, but I could probably nail you...especially if you don't understand optics))) so we'll leave that to the viewers...) I only visited the site for a short time) The most important thing is that there's a discussion) that's the main thing...
And in general, thank you, my dears, for being alive! And for writing... It's so nice to feel that someone is striving for greatness! I will continue to delight you with optical delights and technical flaws!
The picture looks flat despite the "beautiful" bokeh. The right side of the frame is deliberately puffy and glaring. The "author's" color message isn't quite clear.
But basically, you could start a story about "this is how I see it" and "I don't care what you think."
And no matter how many times he sends uneducated commenters packing, the misunderstanding here won't go away - View crop